Blood Done Sign My Name

Blood Done Sign My Name (2010): United States – directed by Jeb Stuart

Rated PG-13 by the MPAA – contains violence, mature themes, intense moments

Blood Done Sign My Name is a good example of a film that lets the historical account of its story get in the way of the film.  In its attempt to be accurate it loses its heart, even going so far as to allow documentary style footage to invade the beginning and end of the film.  This is unfortunate, because the story is interesting and worthy of an accurate and engaging portrayal.

Bizarre documentary-like interviews open the film, as people recall the events of 1970 in a town called Oxford, in North Carolina.  It isn’t clear, particularly when similar interviews appear at the end of the film, if these are people who lived through those events or if they are actors pretending that they did.  After this short and bizarre sequence the actual film begins.

A new minister has moved to Oxford.  He is white, and his name is Vernon Tyson (Rick Schroder).  He has a family and is eager to bring some change to an old southern town.  His church is conservative and affluent, and generally apathetic toward the treatment most black people in the town receive.  When he invites a prominent black preacher to speak he nearly provokes a schism that will rend his church in half, riling up the local KKK and threatening his job safety.

Simultaneously, Ben Chavis (Denzel Washington look-a-like Nate Parker) moves back to Oxford and decides to re-open the old family restaurant.  But then he also teaches at the local black school.  He has family in town, and the black community is very strong and centralized.

Trouble arises when an extremely racist store owner and his two sons murder a recently returned Vietnam vet named Henry Marrow (A.C. Sanford) for a perceived advance on a white woman.  The trial soon becomes a civil rights spotlight, and fire-stoker Goldie Frinks (Afemo Omilami) becomes involved in order to rile up the populace for a march on the state capital.  Racial tensions are high, and soon there are violent protests alongside the peaceful march to see the governor.

The film is set up as an interesting study of two strong characters, one black and one white, who both try to change attitudes in their town.  Tyson tries to reach the hearts of the affluent whites in the city, while Chavis appeals to the hearts of the young black men he teaches.  But after an initial setup for both characters, the film abandons them for the trial and consequences thereof.  Both families move to the background, particularly Tyson’s, whose son Tim (Gattlin Griffith) experienced difficulties arising from segregation and racism.  (On a far more interesting note than the movie provides, Tim Tyson wrote the book, on which the film is based, from his own experiences as Vernon Tyson’s son during the trial.)

Instead, once the film details the murder of Marrow and the resultant public outcry, Chavis and Tyson are relegated to faces in the crowd, occasionally shown as outraged or indignant.  The problem is that they no longer matter to the film, and whatever the trial’s outcome, it won’t have direct consequences for them or their families.  Chavis is more closely tied to the trial, and participates in the march with Frinks, but he no longer has much effect on the proceedings as the matter gets swept into the court of public opinion.

It’s hard to fault a film that so desires to remain historically accurate, but when the audience becomes detached from the subject matter (engaging on its own merits), the film loses its power.  For a small, independent production it is rather smartly made, with credible sets and actors.  There is an appreciable balance to the racial tension, and neither side has a chance to be high and mighty.  The nonviolent black protesters are hurt by some young black men and their violent outbursts, while there are very few sympathetic white people at all.

Blood Done Sign My Name begins with an interesting and important subject, but lets the historical details intrude too much for it to be an interesting and important movie.  Some strong production values (for a small-budgeted film) are overcast by an emotional detachment that ultimately buries the film.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *